I've already discussed one way we use GD on team - students do their organizing and drafting of papers right online, streamlining the writing / editing process while saving a ton of paper (with school budgets being what they are, every dime counts!).
Beyond this, we do a number of collaborative tasks - both among the staff and the students - through GD as well. Our team newsletters, sent out at least monthly, used to be constructed via a chain of emails - each teacher would send me their snippet, I'd then merge them into a doc, and then send it out. Now, we keep a newsletter "shell" and just fill it in by a set time / date - each of us adding our blurb when we have the time - and then, once it's set, I email it out and post it on our team discussion board. Much easier.
Last year, I wanted to use GD to facilitate collaborative discussions among the students, as well. I started with a fairly standard classroom discussion model: while reading Crispin, at set intervals students met in groups to discuss specific chapters. The kids had been tracking facets of the novel in a series of shell note sheets, and - on discussion days - kids would be put into groups, and each group was given one facet as a focal point. After a few minutes, they would send one member to the board to write a key quote they found, and their group's analysis of its importance. We'd then discuss these as a class.
This format had a few problems. First, the board would get crowded pretty quickly - as would the space where students stood while writing. Often, one student would have to wait for another to finish. Second, the work was transient - by the end of the period, I'd have to erase the work in order to be ready for another class.
So, this brought me to my inquiry - could I figure out a way to use GD to streamline the process and eliminate the bottleneck, while using only a limited amount of computers (we have a laptop cart on team that, usually, only has around 6 working units).
Here's what I came up with. My solution uses 6 laptops and one LCD projector.
I began by setting up a discussion document that students could access on Google Docs. I made it public, so anyone could edit it, and posted the link on the class discussion board. It looked like this:
scroll over pic to see descriptions of key elements |
Each group was then given a laptop, and I hooked my laptop up to the LCD projector. I projected the master document onto the wall.
I then gave each group two slips of paper - the first was the topic they had to post about, the 2nd was the topic posting they'd comment on.
Groups went to work. As they decided on the quotes and analysis for their posts, I could see each group typing in real time, as could the rest of the class. Once a group finished their post, they then read another group's entry and responded to it. The filled in form, in class, looked like this:
By the end of the period, we had a full chart - you can see the results here. I then saved the document under a new title - indicating the assignment and the period - and turned off the "anyone can edit" option. I then went back to the master document, clicked on "revision history," selected the original, blank version, and reverted to it -- I was ready for the next class, had saved all the work the kids did, and it was much faster than erasing the board!
At the end of the day, I then posted links to all the finished discussion documents on our discussion board:
This way, students could reference these discussions later - especially when gathering evidence for major assignments. Also, they could see the key ideas developed in the other classes - something that was impossible on a standard white board.
Overall, this approach worked out better than I had anticipated. It had the following benefits over my old way of doing things:
- It streamlined the sharing process - each group could write 'on the board' at the same time.
- Whereas before I'd be hard pressed just to get all the initial quotes on the board during a period, I now had time for the students to critique one another.
- No more handwriting issues on the board - easy to read font.
- By saving the work in these files, the current students could review their peers' work later, and I could even incorporate the class work into a reflective piece later on (like reviewing the posts for homework, and choosing the strongest analysis).
- I have exemplars for future students / years.
- I also found that students became eager to revise their work - on a number of occasions, while one group was critiquing another group's response, I'd see a cursor going back over the original post, trying to improve it before the commenter was even done typing!
No comments:
Post a Comment